March 12, 2004

MIS Exhibit 5: 8/23/01 ADVS Capital One

It is very strange that "somehow" the Capital One reporting was corrected prior to my submission of my 8/8/01 dispute. I also don't have the 7/23/01 report (Exh. 4) they claim to have sent to me. It doesn't contain any investigation results either.

It's also strange that CreditData SW sent the dispute to Capital One, while my dispute was clearly no longer applicable: I had disputed the delinquent balance, reported WITH the bk notation.

Talk about NO procedures at all to ensure the accuracy of credit reports.

And why did they totally change my dispute? They claim that I disputed "present/previous status/MOP rating/payment pattern."

Apparently "Dispute #1: 007" is a "standard" dispute added to all disputes, and my actual dispute is in the remarks.
So, that's all strange. Have to ask about that.

The ACDV:

8-23-01-ADVS-Capital One.jpg

Posted by Christine at March 12, 2004 09:38 PM
This blog has MOVED!

For UPDATES please visit the NEW site at

http://www.creditsuit.org/

Comments



Comments are CLOSED because this blog has MOVED!

For UPDATES please visit and post at the NEW site at http://www.creditsuit.org/