March 06, 2004

Martha Stewart - why is she the only one who is supposed to tell the truth?

I really can't figure this out.

She was NOT convicted of insider trading and the securities fraud charges were dropped.

Stewart's Defense Team Gambled - and Lost

"Instead, jurors convicted Stewart on all four counts - conspiracy, obstruction of justice and two counts of lying to investigators."

I don't get it. She didn't do anything wrong. Who got hurt?

She sold her stock when she got a tip, what's wrong with that? I guess nothing.

Why is it perfectly ok for Pacific Bell to submit false declarations? Why does Judge Broomfield not care?

Why can bankers and lawyers and corporate managers and execs lie under penalty of perjury and it's OK?????

Posted by Christine at March 6, 2004 10:46 PM
This blog has MOVED!

For UPDATES please visit the NEW site at

http://www.creditsuit.org/

Comments



Comments are CLOSED because this blog has MOVED!

For UPDATES please visit and post at the NEW site at http://www.creditsuit.org/