2004 Credit Suit

Trans Union Motion for $5,000 Security for Costs

It's mail day.

And this is probably the funniest thing I've seen yet!

"Plaintiff, an experienced pro se, has a history of filing lawsuits. Plaintiff has filed three suits in small claims court in California and two in Arizona Justice Court in addition to the lawsuit pending in this Court ...."

"... Because of Plaintiff's financial condition, her lack of a meritorious claim against Trans Union, and the substantial amount of costs that could be awarded to the numerous Defendants, Trans Union requests that the Court order Plaintiff to post bond in the amount of $5000 or whatever amount the Court deems appropriate to secure the costs that have been and will be incurred by Trans Union in defending this lawsuit."

Apparently they wrote this in response to my objection to the TU CEO Harry Gambill motion to dismiss.

"Plaintiff requests that Harry Gambill not be dismissed because his company, Trans Union, inflicts serious damages on plaintiff and literally millions of people and Mr. Gambill categorically refuses to change his company’s policies and procedures. It is likely that Trans Union will be forced into bankruptcy due to consumer litigation and plaintiff would like to be able to collect the judgment she anticipates receiving against Trans Union in this action."

I have some real good evidence for this too, and I just hope that one of these days I'll be able to scan and post all filings.