I posted my filing and the table of exhibits at http://forum.creditcourt.com/discus/messages/803/3419.html - still have to scan a bunch of the defendants' motions, hopefully next week.
Am working on my reply to TU CEO Gambill's motion to dismiss. Of course he knows NOTHING and thinks he can't be touched. That's what some of those Enron execs thought, and they're going to the Grey Bar Hotel. Not long enough, as far as I'm concerned, but it's a start.
The CEOs and the Feds may well be dismissed, but how are they going to answer the next suit with "I didn't know?"
The more research I do, the clearer it becomes that a CRIMINAL investigation is in order.
The regulators are not only protecting the CRAs, but are actively promoting their products instead of enforcing consumer protection legislation. Looking around the FTC site almost makes me physically ill.
It is so obvious that the Feds WANT credit reporting to be exactly what it is, to keep a good 30% of the population at "sub prime" credit scores.
This is bigger than slavery, the perfect way to have many millions working crummy jobs for nothing but crappy food, with all the disposable income (and more) going to banksters and insurers, and of course CRAs.
US Attorney Paul K. Charlton doesn't know what the problem is with T-Mobile refusing cancellations and Pacific Bell refusing to credit payments after receiving proof of payment and then selling the account for collections?
(I deleted my comment about where his head seems to be.)
Fair Isaac sent me an ad today, telling me that the FTC recommends that I should check my credit reports. I actually would, if I could. Tried again a few days ago, both Trans Union and Equifax had my file blocked.